<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>

<channel>
	<title>picorob.com &#187; tzitzit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://picorob.com/tag/tzitzit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://picorob.com</link>
	<description>Pico-Robertson, Torah Town, 90035</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:29:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<copyright>Levi</copyright>
		<itunes:author>Levi</itunes:author>
		<itunes:summary>Pico-Robertson, 90035</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		
		<item>
		<title>Rashi&#039;s Daughters Revisited</title>
		<link>http://picorob.com/2008/06/30/rashis-daughters-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://picorob.com/2008/06/30/rashis-daughters-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Levi Ben Avraham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first appearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[halakah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jewish thinkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[king saul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rashi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tzitzit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://picorob.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mamaloshen.blogspot.com/2008/06/rashis-daughters-revisted.html">Chavi the Convert blogs</a>:</p>
<p>In <a href="http://mamaloshen.blogspot.com/2008/06/tiny-kvetch.html">this post</a>, I issued my irritation at the perpetuation of <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" class="blsp-spelling-error">Rashi&#039;s</span> daughters as a true, factual set of events in history, whereas in truth it is merely a legend developed with no factual documentation beyond it&#039;s first appearance in the 18<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_1" class="blsp-spelling-error">th</span> century. However, I never said that there are no factual instances of women donning <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_2" class="blsp-spelling-error">tefillin</span> or studying Talmud or being learned in the ways of <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_3" class="blsp-spelling-error">halakah</span> or Judaism.</p>
<p><a href="http://picorob.com/2008/06/30/rashis-daughters-revisited/" class="more-link">Read more on Rashi&#039;s Daughters Revisited&#8230;</a></p>


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mamaloshen.blogspot.com/2008/06/rashis-daughters-revisted.html">Chavi the Convert blogs</a>:</p>
<p>In <a href="http://mamaloshen.blogspot.com/2008/06/tiny-kvetch.html">this post</a>, I issued my irritation at the perpetuation of <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_0" class="blsp-spelling-error">Rashi&#039;s</span> daughters as a true, factual set of events in history, whereas in truth it is merely a legend developed with no factual documentation beyond it&#039;s first appearance in the 18<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_1" class="blsp-spelling-error">th</span> century. However, I never said that there are no factual instances of women donning <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_2" class="blsp-spelling-error">tefillin</span> or studying Talmud or being learned in the ways of <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_3" class="blsp-spelling-error">halakah</span> or Judaism.</p>
<p>There are many instances of this, including that Michal, daughter of King Saul, donning <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_4" class="blsp-spelling-error">tefillin</span>. In <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_5" class="blsp-spelling-error">Eruvin</span> in the Talmud there is also notation that &#034;Michal daughter of <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_6" class="blsp-spelling-error">Kushi</span> wore <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_7" class="blsp-spelling-error">tefillin</span> and the sages did not protest.&#034; Likewise, the wife of <a title="Chaim ibn Attar" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaim_ibn_Attar">Chaim <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_8" class="blsp-spelling-error">ibn</span> Attar</a> and the <a title="Maiden of Ludmir" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maiden_of_Ludmir">Maiden of <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_9" class="blsp-spelling-error">Ludmir</span></a> (19<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_10" class="blsp-spelling-error">th</span> century) also were known to have practiced this <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_11" class="blsp-spelling-error">mitzvah</span>.</p>
<p>To be sure, <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_12" class="blsp-spelling-error">tefillin</span> is not prohibited for women. You see, it&#039;s a time-bound <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_13" class="blsp-spelling-error">mitzvah</span> to which women are not held. However, this does not necessarily mean it is prohibited. Some sages, including <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_14" class="blsp-spelling-error">Rashi</span> and the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_15" class="blsp-spelling-error">Rambam</span> said that it was completely acceptable, but that women were not to say the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_16" class="blsp-spelling-error">b&#039;racha</span> (blessing), because the &#034;who has commanded us&#034; would not apply. Specifically, the <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_17" class="blsp-spelling-error">Rambam</span> says, &#034;Women, slaves, and minors are exempt from <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_18" class="blsp-spelling-error">tzitzit</span> from the Torah &#8230; women and slaves who want to wrap themselves in <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_19" class="blsp-spelling-error">tzitzit</span> may do so without a <em><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_20" class="blsp-spelling-error">berakha</span></em>. And so too with other such <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_21" class="blsp-spelling-error">mitzvot</span> from which women are exempt: if they want to perform them without a <em><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_22" class="blsp-spelling-error">berakha</span></em>, one does not protest&#034; (<em><span id="SPELLING_ERROR_23" class="blsp-spelling-error">Hilkhot</span> <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_24" class="blsp-spelling-error">Tsitsit</span></em> 3:9).</p>
<p>My point in all of this is that there is a difference between historical documentation of women &#8212; plain or semi-important or even great women &#8212; donning <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_25" class="blsp-spelling-error">tefillin</span> or writing <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_26" class="blsp-spelling-error">responsa</span> or studying Talmud and <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_27" class="blsp-spelling-error">Rashi&#039;s</span> daughters doing these things. Why is this? Well, <span id="SPELLING_ERROR_28" class="blsp-spelling-error">Rashi</span> is perhaps one of the greatest Jewish thinkers of all time, and I don&#039;t think anyone would disagree with me there. There is much more weight, as such, put into the stories of his daughters being this great liberating, free thinking women of the 11<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_29" class="blsp-spelling-error">th</span> century than of perhaps any other women of the 11<span id="SPELLING_ERROR_30" class="blsp-spelling-error">th</span> century doing these things. It&#039;s about influence, reputation.</p>
<p>In all things we seek out the best, most reliable source of information if we are preparing to do something. It is why there is a ladder, so to speak, in just about every aspect of life. We seek out the most reliable mechanic on how to fix our cars, we go to the best doctors we can find to seek the best treatment for our ailments, we take our ques from those with the best reputation and we rely on them to not lead us astray.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://picorob.com/2008/06/30/rashis-daughters-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
